Probability Geometry is a new geometry based on probability being a basic dimension of reality.

Multi-variable conditional theory in physics leads to a new type of geometry. That is because Euclidian geometry and it's manifestations are about arbitrary human organization of our physical perspective and not about natural organization derived from happenstance and random uncontrolled relationships . We tend to think of reality as made of points and then particles and if not that we end up with harmony and string theory . If there is music in the universe it does seem to have a melody in far too many places for our conscious desires to understand things in a rational way to explain. Probability as a basic dimensions quickly explains everything because we know we can count on probability and we don't really understand why. Counting on probability is being able to predict or deduce either a future event that will occur or explain why it has occurred. So Therein lies the need for a geometry based on probability . I am surprised no one has figured it out before. The disjunction between our mathematics geometry and the every day reality of probability should lead to a logical format that allows probability to explain itself.

Probability Geometry is a new geometry based on probability being a basic dimension of reality.

Multi-variable conditional theory in physics leads to a new type of geometry. That is because Euclidian geometry and it's manifestations are about arbitrary human organization of our physical perspective and not about natural organization derived from happenstance and random uncontrolled relationships . We tend to think of reality as made of points and then particles and if not that we end up with harmony and string theory . If there is music in the universe it does seem to have a melody in far too many places for our conscious desires to understand things in a rational way to explain. Probability as a basic dimensions quickly explains everything because we know we can count on probability and we don't really understand why. Counting on probability is being able to predict or deduce either a future event that will occur or explain why it has occurred. So Therein lies the need for a geometry based on probability . I am surprised no one has figured it out before. The disjunction between our mathematics geometry and the every day reality of probability should lead to a logical format that allows probability to explain itself.

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Visualizing Expanding Probability

If you want to visualize expanding probability you might first think of a sphere.  That is inadequate because yes the sphere will expand but new spheres of probability that also expand will form at every juncture point and almost all points no matter where they are could be a probability relationship. Linking base core point variables does not mean the permutations are not going to be infinite. Fortunately we have a universe astronomers look out at and we see the same structures repeated over and over again all all assumed distances from our position in the cosmos.  Maybe that layout of stuff in the universe is a way of looking at probability itself as if that is the visualization of a real life generator of probability?  I would be tempted to accept that idea and scale to just our solar system to say it is a generator of probability taking into account positions, composition of masses and other characteristics as they are positioned around the sun.  I see a sort of  centrifugal stratification from rocky core planets out though the gas giants to frozen planets and definately sense a sort of probability expressing itself.  With no other solar system to compare it to there is nothing yet to certify my perceptions.  But we can experiment by creating our own small planets at various position from the sun out into space at variable distances to see if we really do have stratification and if there really is a sort of bell curve with the greatest mass the approximate distance of Jupiter reduced in or out from there.
That is sort of a natural bell curve .

No comments:

Post a Comment