Every event in probabiliy has to be caused by some kinetic energy interaction of masses. That is why they are defined as events in probability

My new laws of physics is getting a major re-write soon as I just realized that every event in probability is only possible because of stored kinetic energy.  It makes the probability as a basic dimension of the cosmos and reality an absolute certainty...wait that is 100 percent probability.  exactly.    HOWEVER, probability can run from zero to infinity for particular types of events and there are events at the microscopic as subatomic particles to macro level events of larger than galactic events.  Add to that infinite possible variations that are possible.  Did you know that music is the controlled release of kinetic energy?  notes are events even complex multi variable events. It is only beginning. I always suspected there was something stupid about string theory analogy and that is because it lack empirical data.  I have instant empirical data.   Just knowing that an object in motion staying in motion it metric free space has no Cartesian plane associated with it. That object can accelerate to an infinite velocity and even if the force is with it it will not be expressed until an event happens. The only event that happens is that object having some kind of physical interaction with some other mass or object in space.  Now what would really fast non interacting masses in space look like?  black maybe casting a shadow if they absorb/reflect light which is an interaction.  There is also magnetic interaction but a source is required.  The interaction of fast and slow mater with light is supposed to be exactly the same ?  photon interaction I don't class as mass interactions . Hey but maybe that big bang supposed background radiation is from suppressed kinetic energy photon interaction nothing more?

Visualizing Expanding Probability

If you want to visualize expanding probability you might first think of a sphere.  That is inadequate because yes the sphere will expand but new spheres of probability that also expand will form at every juncture point and almost all points no matter where they are could be a probability relationship. Linking base core point variables does not mean the permutations are not going to be infinite. Fortunately we have a universe astronomers look out at and we see the same structures repeated over and over again all all assumed distances from our position in the cosmos.  Maybe that layout of stuff in the universe is a way of looking at probability itself as if that is the visualization of a real life generator of probability?  I would be tempted to accept that idea and scale to just our solar system to say it is a generator of probability taking into account positions, composition of masses and other characteristics as they are positioned around the sun.  I see a sort of  centrifugal stratification from rocky core planets out though the gas giants to frozen planets and definately sense a sort of probability expressing itself.  With no other solar system to compare it to there is nothing yet to certify my perceptions.  But we can experiment by creating our own small planets at various position from the sun out into space at variable distances to see if we really do have stratification and if there really is a sort of bell curve with the greatest mass the approximate distance of Jupiter reduced in or out from there.
That is sort of a natural bell curve .

To start with I have not yet formulated this geometry yet.  However I do have a sense about where it will be going.  Starting with a point as in Euclidian geometry we find it has no metrics because it is alone.  If there is space there is no more space than can envelope that point.  Space can not exist without more than one point for anything to be beyond or between as space.  A second point could , COULD, in this theory form a line with the first point as in Euclidian Geometry except that probability is key.  Two points can offer a variety of permutations between the two .  I suppose there can be distance between the two points and if so than there is space or the points can be connected or they can rotate around each other or one can rotate around the other and if they form a line that line can rotate forming a circle or a sphere . Of course those possibilities require other dimensional attributes as variables that can include time and energy.  The two points can grow closer together or further apart from each other they can work to create space between them though not necessarily beyond unless your line between the two is deemed to be infinite.  Points are also interchangeable with themselves and with nothing.


A third point makes a hole new set of variables with considerable complexity and it again includes various types of interactive rotations, formations of line, planes spheres.  In Euclidian geometry there are no basic rotation variables not until a circle is studied and that circle tends to have a circumference where as the ones formed between points no necessary circumference as if a line that is infinite rotates there can be a sphere that is infinite.  The geometry then goes to four point which can be two separate lines, four lines or even just one line with all points on that same line.  So maybe you get the sense about where this is going?  If you do then we can map out probability using this new form of geometry