Probability Geometry is a new geometry based on probability being a basic dimension of reality.

Multi-variable conditional theory in physics leads to a new type of geometry. That is because Euclidian geometry and it's manifestations are about arbitrary human organization of our physical perspective and not about natural organization derived from happenstance and random uncontrolled relationships . We tend to think of reality as made of points and then particles and if not that we end up with harmony and string theory . If there is music in the universe it does seem to have a melody in far too many places for our conscious desires to understand things in a rational way to explain. Probability as a basic dimensions quickly explains everything because we know we can count on probability and we don't really understand why. Counting on probability is being able to predict or deduce either a future event that will occur or explain why it has occurred. So Therein lies the need for a geometry based on probability . I am surprised no one has figured it out before. The disjunction between our mathematics geometry and the every day reality of probability should lead to a logical format that allows probability to explain itself.

Probability Geometry is a new geometry based on probability being a basic dimension of reality.

Multi-variable conditional theory in physics leads to a new type of geometry. That is because Euclidian geometry and it's manifestations are about arbitrary human organization of our physical perspective and not about natural organization derived from happenstance and random uncontrolled relationships . We tend to think of reality as made of points and then particles and if not that we end up with harmony and string theory . If there is music in the universe it does seem to have a melody in far too many places for our conscious desires to understand things in a rational way to explain. Probability as a basic dimensions quickly explains everything because we know we can count on probability and we don't really understand why. Counting on probability is being able to predict or deduce either a future event that will occur or explain why it has occurred. So Therein lies the need for a geometry based on probability . I am surprised no one has figured it out before. The disjunction between our mathematics geometry and the every day reality of probability should lead to a logical format that allows probability to explain itself.

Saturday, September 12, 2015

Every event in probabiliy has to be caused by some kinetic energy interaction of masses. That is why they are defined as events in probability

My new laws of physics is getting a major re-write soon as I just realized that every event in probability is only possible because of stored kinetic energy.  It makes the probability as a basic dimension of the cosmos and reality an absolute certainty...wait that is 100 percent probability.  exactly.    HOWEVER, probability can run from zero to infinity for particular types of events and there are events at the microscopic as subatomic particles to macro level events of larger than galactic events.  Add to that infinite possible variations that are possible.  Did you know that music is the controlled release of kinetic energy?  notes are events even complex multi variable events. It is only beginning. I always suspected there was something stupid about string theory analogy and that is because it lack empirical data.  I have instant empirical data.   Just knowing that an object in motion staying in motion it metric free space has no Cartesian plane associated with it. That object can accelerate to an infinite velocity and even if the force is with it it will not be expressed until an event happens. The only event that happens is that object having some kind of physical interaction with some other mass or object in space.  Now what would really fast non interacting masses in space look like?  black maybe casting a shadow if they absorb/reflect light which is an interaction.  There is also magnetic interaction but a source is required.  The interaction of fast and slow mater with light is supposed to be exactly the same ?  photon interaction I don't class as mass interactions . Hey but maybe that big bang supposed background radiation is from suppressed kinetic energy photon interaction nothing more?
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)